Wednesday, August 06, 2003

Round the world and home again
That's the sailor's way
Faster faster, faster faster

There's no earthly way of knowing
Which direction we are going
There's no knowing where we're rowing
Or which way the river's flowing

Is it raining, is it snowing
Is a hurricane a–blowing

Not a speck of light is showing
So the danger must be growing
Are the fires of Hell a–glowing
Is the grisly reaper mowing

Yes, the danger must be growing
For the rowers keep on rowing
And they're certainly not showing
Any signs that they are slowing
Sodium Flouride Mind numb? Can't think for yourself? Perhaps it's this....

Sodium Flouride, not to be confused with "Calcium Flouride" is a registered ingredient in "RAT POISON" that through long periods of ingestion collects in the human body and can cause serious illness. Our bodies absorb the element but does not secrete it. Some people are less sensitive than others and this poison can cause cancer of the liver and other vital organs.

Let me ask you this simple question. Do you enjoy knowing the fact that dentists have kept this information regarding SF from their patients? Do you want to have your drinking water treated with "SODIUM FLOURIDE" a known cancer carcinogen? Go ahead keep using poison if you like but at least be aware of the fact that you are ingesting rat poison every time you brush your teeth!!!

Fluoridation is UNETHICAL because:

1) It violates the individual's right to informed consent to medication.
2) The municipality cannot control the dose of the patient.
3) The municipality cannot track each individual's response.
4) It ignores the fact that some people are more vulnerable to fluoride's toxic effects than others. Some people will suffer while others may benefit.
5) It violates the Nuremberg code for human experimentation.


There are a multitude of resources available to read about this subject. Check out this page for links to many articles:

Fluoride Links Page


Judges? Politicians in Robes, Judicial Watch's Klayman Says on 'White
House Chronicle'
Tuesday August 5, 12:14 pm ET


WASHINGTON, Aug. 5 /PRNewswire/ -- America needs tort reform, but not as
much as it needs better judges, according to the head of Judicial Watch,
the Washington, D.C.-based conservative legal group.

"There needs to be tort reform, but not as currently proposed by this
Congress and President Bush. That is just a gift to the medical
profession," said Larry Klayman, chairman and general counsel of Judicial
Watch, appearing on this week's edition of "White House Chronicle," a PBS
political talk show.

He added: "What we need are better judges."

Klayman sharply criticized federal judges, who are chosen because of the
favors they have done for the president or a senator. "They are not the
best and the brightest," he said, adding, "All the tools exist for judges
to throw out frivolous lawsuits, and cut back on excessive damage awards.
But we don't have judges who will stand on principle."

Frankly, he said, "We have judges who are politicians in robes."

Klayman said he was "bothered" by the lack of public interest in the
judicial appointments issue. "In some states, [people] are very
interested: California and Florida, my home state. In Florida, they're
very interested in judges because they've seen the Florida Supreme Court
go crazy over the years, as well as the other courts. But in other states,
it is a secondary issue."

Ironically, Klayman said, most Americans have had some experience with the
legal system, whether it's a family law matter or a contract dispute.
"They almost always walk away with a bad taste in their mouth," he said.
"And that's the result of intellectually and actually corrupt lawyers and
judges ... When people walk into a courtroom today, more often than not
they'll find judges pontificating from the bench, carrying on, disparaging
people."

Klayman said those courtroom scenes, not President Clinton's exploits, led
him to found Judicial Watch in 1984. "I started Judicial Watch not because
of Bill Clinton, but because my own profession had gone very corrupt."

Asked about the 15-lawyer group's biggest success, in terms of setting
legal precedent or effecting public policy change, in last decade, Klayman
said: "The biggest precedent that we set is that we, in effect, became a
private Justice Department ... Whether it is a Democratic or Republican
administration, we know that the Justice Department isn't going to bring
cases against their own administration. So we have stepped into that
void."

Just look, he added, at Judicial Watch's seal and motto, "Because no one
is above the law."

As for Attorney Gen. John Ascroft's handling of the department, where he
once worked as a trial lawyer, Klayman said: "I don't think, frankly, we
conservatives had high hopes for John Ashcroft ... True conservatives,
like true liberals, don't believe in violating peoples' civil liberties.
... And that is what we are seeing at the Justice Department with the
Patriot Act."

Klayman added that he is not necessarily in agreement with his Judicial
Watch colleagues on the Patriot Act. "I think it's very dangerous."

He went on to criticize Ashcroft's handling of Judicial Watch cases that
have held over from the Clinton administration. "He has continued to
prosecute them and pay the Clintons' legal fees, through the taxpayers.
It's just mind-boggling to me that he couldn't settle those cases.
Filegate, for example: 900 Republicans' files taken by the Clinton White
House. Why not settle the case?"

During the wide-ranging interview, with co-hosts Llewellyn King and Linda
Gasparello, Klayman also discussed the lawsuit Judicial Watch brought
against Vice President Cheney's energy advisory committee.

Tuesday, August 05, 2003

July 17, 2003 Transcript: Bush-Blair news conference. When asked about where Iraq's WMD's are Bush said, "we will bring the weapons." http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/07/17/bush.blair.presser.transcript/